Wharton To Ask Rec Writers For ‘Essays’

Wharton School activities and development the board teacher Christian Terwiesch instructing class After a significant audit, the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School has chosen to solicit recommenders from its MBA candidates to viably compose two short articles on the applicants they are suggesting. The changes, compelling with the forthcoming 2017-2018 confirmations cycle, happened after the school reviewed in excess of 1,200 journalists of proposal letters and got some information about their involvement all the while. Bad habit Dean Maryellen Reilly, who regarded the general â€Å"significant,† said they were being put forth â€Å"in an attempt to get a more profound comprehension of a candidate’s individual qualities and their effect on others all through their career.† It’s a significant changeup, to some extent, since business colleges have been decreasing the number and the length of articles for MBA candidates for quite a while at this point. In any event on a superficial level, it appears to be unexpected that a school would now choose to basically approach proposal scholars for a couple of 300-word expositions. The move likewise comes not long after a few schools have moved to a typical rec letter organization to make it simpler for recommenders to offer help for their possibility to a few schools. Quick FEEDBACK FROM ADMISSION CONSULTANTS MIXED Yet, Wharton apparently figured it could enhance the current framework in the wake of approaching rec authors for their viewpoints. â€Å"Utilizing their important criticism, related to discussions with scholars at an assortment of organizations and Wharton partners, we have overhauled and improved how recommenders give data on who an up-and-comer is both actually and inside an organization,† composed Deputy Vice Dean Maryellen Reilly in a blog entry about the change. A few MBA confirmation experts, in any case, weren’t almost as eager about the change, to a great extent since they considered it to be an extra weight on recommenders. That could urge more recommenders to approach candidates to compose the articles for their endorsement. â€Å"For the character attributes, fortunately Wharton is attempting to get credible and insightful reactions from recommenders, as opposed to actually ‘check-the-box,† says Betsy Massar, organizer of Master Admissions. â€Å"Because there are really no set in stone answers, ideally, understudies won’t be as on edge about not being top at everything. For the subjective inquiries, It’s extraordinary that the exposition question explicitly says in advance, â€Å"give examples.† Maybe that will bring more substance into a portion of the high-acclaim however soft suggestions that don’t separate applicants at all. â€Å"On the downside,† she includes, â€Å"moving ceaselessly from the basic application addresses that have been asked by other top schools truly puts to a greater extent a weight on the recommender. That has a wide range of repercussions that builds nervousness for the understudy and may even imply that Wharton loses a few candidates. Not certain that’s an ideal result for anyone.† Candidates MORE LIKELY TO SUCCUMB TO ‘YOU-WRITE-IT-I’LL SIGN-IT’ Linda Abraham, originator and CEO of Accepted.com, concurred. â€Å"Even those slanted to compose their own recs are bound to capitulate to the efficient allurement of you-compose it-I’ll-sign-it on the off chance that they need to compose two extra, particular reactions to the open inquiries presented in the Wharton rec,† she says. â€Å"This would be particularly valid for candidates applying to more schools.† Jeremy Shinewald, originator and CEO of mbaMission, sees an upside and drawback to the change. â€Å"Unquestionably, comparative with different schools, Wharton will get increasingly insightful and brilliant letters from the individuals who pay attention to the proposal procedure †the inquiries nearly power that outcome,† he says. â€Å"Unfortunately, they may likewise fill in as an impetus for those recommenders who might not have any desire to place the time in and who may not place the time in and choose to avoid their duties by and large. Since a genuinely phenomenal letter of suggestion can be an exceptionally incredible differentiator for any candidate, we emphatically encourage our customers to meet with their recommenders and talk about the procedure and all the more so writing a champion letter. â€Å"In doing as such, we generally encourage our customers to be prepared to strategically stand up against a manager who says â€Å"write it yourself.† There is a motivation behind why the schools need proposal letters †they need knowledge that a candidate just can’t unbiasedly and compellingly state about themselves. Thus, we may underline an additional degree of readiness for pushback to our Wharton candidates, since it will work well for them. They will have a superior possibility of getting in on the off chance that they can convince their recommenders to grasp the process.†

Words Will Do Harm free essay sample

As children, a large number of us played the straightforward word round of executioner. In spite of the fact that the game may appear to be innocuous, understand that the game shows us something life; if player one says an inappropriate thing to player two, it’s game over. Menaces regularly use words to assault their casualties. These words, when utilized erroneously, regularly lead to annihilating impacts, for example, misery, uneasiness, and other physical and mental issues. Consistently, I am compelled to sit by and tune in to gossipy tidbits about my dearest companions develop. One of my companions, who has been nicknamed Morgan for security reasons, has the sad propensity to get harassed. Rather than tuning in to these gossipy tidbits, I address him about different things, not rotating around the bits of gossip, to brighten him up. I protect him and regularly reprimand any individual who shares gossip about him. Morgan’s story is one of the a large number of storie s informed today regarding harassing. Individuals frequently ask, â€Å"How would we be able to stop bullying?† I accept the primary things we have to do is find out about what makes it start with, what impacts it has on our psychological well-being, and what delayed harassing causes over the long haul. Getting harassing and its belongings will get us one bit nearer to discovering arrangements and closure the issue. To start, understanding why harassing happens requires an essential information on what causes it in any case. Harassing is frequently brought about by family issues, social issues, and individual history among other littler classifications. Family issues incorporate having an oppressive parent, a separation in the house, conflicting control, and living in a dangerous/unclean condition. Social issues are nearer to individual, mental purposes behind harassing. They incorporate a longing for consideration, desire, envy, and the absence of individual/social aptitudes. Individual issues are frequently edged on by different factors such threatening family issues or a psychological instability. Individual history is things that have occurred in life due to past activities, including less than stellar scores, wellbeing, or social dismissal. I feel like Morgan’s menaces were brought about by a blend of every one of the three. I know a portion of these individuals on a companion level and realize that they get horrible scores, or they will in general get envious. Here and there, I may offer to assist them with these issues, however they are regularly insane. Notwithstanding close to home history, another factor of harassing, its causes, and results can be limited to the ever-changing subject of psychological well-being. Tormenting is regularly connected to emotional wellness issues on both the harasser side and the casualty side. Menaces themselves regularly have a spray of low confidence and sympathize with the need to calm their agony on another person. The people in question, nonetheless, will in general give indications of melancholy and nervousness just as physical issues brought about by psychological instability, for example, nonattendance from school and disorder. Youngsters who end it all, also called bullycide when brought about by a harasser, regularly have sadness before self destruction. In general, there are 100 endeavors at self destruction for each deadly endeavor. Once, I was stunned to discover a note left in my storage by Morgan, who clarified how he ‘felt like a slave’ and ‘found no good reason for life’ One understudy had even offered installment to Morgan on the off chance that he slaughtered himself. Despite the fact that I realized I expected to report the occurrence, I didn’t on the grounds that I expected that I would destroy our companionship. To expand, before mankind can quit tormenting, it’s great to know why it ought to be halted in any case. Harassing makes various results from case. In any case, the absolute most basic impacts the casualty may get are lower confidence, distrustfulness, ceaseless psychological sickness, and an abhorrence for school. As referenced before, bullycide is self destruction brought about by harassing. Casualties of tormenting are up to nine percent bound to think about self destruction than different understudies. Self destruction is the third driving reason for death in youngsters and murders 4,400 passings for every year. Proceeding Morgan’s story, I should concede that I accept he has had some drawn out impacts because of the tormenting. He shows compelling feeling and has dull contemplations, like an encounter I once had. I now and again dread for his wellbeing just as my own. It’s difficult to discern whether daily will come when a dear companion executes themself, or when they will be driven excessively far. Putting it quickly, it is imperative to realize why harassing occurs, what psychological wellness has to do with it, and the impacts of tormenting over the long haul so we comprehend what a huge issue it is. I believe that the administration needs to set up a superior framework for emotional wellness screening and a framework for tormenting reports. Research shows that diagnosing mental clutters early prompts better results (Mental Health Screening). This framework shouldn’t simply help the people in question, however the domineering jerks as well! There ought to be simpler, less muddled approaches to report harassing that are thought of as top need. We ought to likewise pay attention to emotional wellness. The framework ought to be a more secure, less scary approach to test for psychological sicknesses on everybody. On the off chance that an individual is awkward, they won’t open up about their emotions, their maltreatment, or their tormenting. In the event that a hara sser realizes they will be kicked out of school, they will never go to discover help for themselves. On an individual level, an onlooker can go to bat for the individuals who are harassed around them. Maybe if everybody welcomed a pariah to have lunch with them, play sports, or work on a task could spare a real existence from self destruction. All things considered, harassing isn’t a simple subject to talk about or finish up, yet on the off chance that everybody does their part, we may discover an answer for this ever-changing perspective.

The New Testament Times

The Jewish strict world is viewed as one of the significant topics during the New Testament times. So as to completely comprehend the New Testament, one must have a more clear comprehension of what are the potential likenesses or potential contrasts between the Jewish strict world and non-Jewish strict world during the hour of Christ. The center concentration during the moment of the Old Testament was the law and the agreement, however during the hour of the New Testament, it was Jesus Christ. Let us initially consider the non-Jewish strict world as the Christian world. The fundamental likeness between the Jews and the non-Jew, especially the Christians, is that they had faith in a similar God and the two gatherings have recognized the authority of the Old Testament. Be that as it may, one of the primary contrasts between the Jews and the Christians lies in each cluster’s impression of the â€Å"messiah†. It has been said that well before the hour of Jesus Christ, most Jews have just sought after the happening to the â€Å"messiah†, an incredible, effective vanquishing ruler from the blood ancestry of King David. This lord is supposed to be the person who might lead Israel to the pinnacle of brilliance, with harmony and triumph everywhere throughout the state. Be that as it may, during Christ’s time, his supporters had just acclaimed Him as the â€Å"Messiah†. Therefore, Christians viewed the â€Å"messiah† as their methods for profound salvation in light of Christ’s nature as Son of God. Differentiating to what the Jews have accepted, Christ had not lived to be an incredible political figure yet a giving up, killed person who offered radical expressions, some of which is opposing with the Jewish strict world. These extreme proclamations lead to the acknowledgment of Gentiles or non-Jews into the network. Jesus instructed that the reason for God’s acknowledgment is confidence. The congregation grasps Jews and non-Jews the same. Clashing with the thought, the Pharisees accepted that God is specific with compliance of the law from the Old Testament. They guessed that the act of high good thoughts will make them legitimately strict. Therefore, they viewed themselves as holier than non-Pharisees. During the New Testament times, Christianity spread to Asia Minor and Greece. The Jews additionally spread and had huge populaces in urban areas around the globe. With the Christians and the Jews investigated, let us presently consider the non-Jewish strict world as the Greco-Roman strict world, additionally during a similar period. One extraordinary contrast between the Jewish strict world and the Greco-Roman strict world is the quantity of divine beings where every strict world perceives. The Jews trusted in just a single God, a similar God of the Christians. Be that as it may, the Greek and the Romans have loved various divinities. The Greek and Roman religion is said to have converged during the hour of the New Testament. This came about to various religions with one god or goddess being belittled. Opposing with the high good gauges of the Jewish strict world, these factions are said to direct celebrations out of appreciation for their god or goddess in which they take part in â€Å"immoral† exercises. The Cult of Attis, for instance, includes numerous blow-outs. Another model is the Cult of Bacchus where its devotees, during the merry days, participate in tanked furors to recognize the endowment of life. Reference: Grolier Encyclopedia of Knowledge. Vol. 3. USA: Grolier Incorporated. 2002. pp.102-106 Key Elements of the Background to the New Testament.â Available: May 6, 2006 Â

The Brothers Karamazov A Psychoanalytic Approach - Literature Essay Samples

When reading a book as brilliant as The Brother’s Karamazov, one wonders where Dostoevsky’s inspiration came from. According to Sigmund Freud, the novel must not be studied as a fiction but as a science, that being psychology. It seems that the innermost thoughts of Dostoevsky were manifested in his characters. Dostoevsky, just like every other boy, experienced the Oedipal complex during his childhood. Freud says that at this stage in a boy’s life, he has the desire to kill his father in order to obtain his mother, but at the same time he admires and loves his father. Due to his father’s harsh disposition and his eventual murder, Dostoevsky was never able to get over his conflicting feelings of guilt. The protagonists in The Brothers Karamazov represent warring aspects of Dostoevsky’s psyche. It is an allegory in which Dostoevsky’s harshly sadistic superego, which inflicts all the feelings of guilt he felt about his father’s murder, is represented by Fyodor Pavlovich, his pleasure-driven id, which is his impulsive desire to kill his father, is represented by Smerdyakov, and his guilt-ridden ego is represented by the other three brothers, Dmitri, Ivan, and Alyosha. Sigmund Freud identifies three major parts that make up the human psyche: the id, the ego, and the superego. In a healthy individual these three parts work in tandem with each other, creating a well functioning human being. The id, the most primal part of the psyche, strives only to satisfy immediate urges based on impulse. As an individual grows up and his brain develops, the ego forms. In his essay The Ego and the Id,: Freud states that the ego is â€Å"the part of the id that has been modified by the direct influence of the external world† (630). It performs the vital function of controlling the id’s actions. If you imagine the id to be a free-flowing river, the ego acts as a dam that can open and close, allowing the river to flow or not to flow, depending on the greater needs of the individual in the circumstances that he finds himself in. A person for example may have the desire to kill someone, but because the ego identifies that a punishment may ensue as a result of this action, the ego stops the id from acting on its impulse. Last to develop, the superego operates as a psychological force examining, interpreting, and judging the thoughts and feelings of the ego. Like a parent towards his child, the superego praises or censures the ego’s actions. This represents Freud’s Perception System and its inner workings. When a person’s superego is perverted however, the other parts of the psyche become perverted as well. Freud explains the reason for these perversions in his essay Dostoevsky and Parricide: the Superego is the inheritor of the parental influence. If the father was hard, violent, or cruel, the superego takes over those attributes from him and forms abnormal relations between the ego and superego. The superego has become sadistic, and the ego becomes masochistic. A great need for punishment develops in the ego, and in part finds satisfaction in ill treatment by the superego. (104) Dostoevsky’s father was alw ays very harsh on him, and since the superego inherits the characteristics of the parent, his superego became equally harsh on his ego. His father was â€Å"rather ill-tempered and distrustful, and brought up his children in the old orthodox fashion, in an atmosphere of fear and obedience† (Bondarenko). This severe, strict environment that Dostoevsky grew up being chastised in came to feel normal to him, and his psyche was not satiated unless he felt that his superego was castigating his ego. Dostoevsky’s masochistic desire was so great that he eventually came to the conclusion that the only path to inner peace is through suffering. In The Brothers Karamazov, the brothers’ biological father, Fyodor Pavlovich, personifies Dostoevsky’s superego. In the court case it is brought up that Dmitri â€Å"as a child in his father’s house, might not such a man well have remembered for twenty-three years how he ran in his father’s back-yard, without boots on his feet and with his little trousers hanging by one button† (Dostoevsky 742). Fyodor Pavlovich is a brutally cruel character that distorts and perverts his children, representing the perversion of the ego. Just as the superego does to the ego, Fyodor becomes both the source of condemnation toward his children’s innate desires, including any of their lust-filled, murderous and Oedipal impulses, as well as the inspiration for their guilt. Growing up next to an orphanage for abandoned infants, Dostoevsky must have been exposed early on to harsh truths about his life, perverting his superego’s moral even further. While Dosto evsky’s superego was morphed based on this orphanage and the rest of his unfortunate surrounding world, Fyodor abandoned his children, bestowing upon them only his own warped morals. Fyodor and Dostoevsky share many qualities in their lifestyle. Dostoevsky had serious gambling problems, and was married twice, while Fyodor acts as a spendthrift, practically shoving his money at Grushenka and having two unsuccessful marriages. Both of them exhibit a corrupted moral code shown in their similar life choices. Dostoevsky parallels Smerdyakov’s life with his own. In terms of Dostoevsky’s psyche, Smerdyakov takes the role of our author’s id. The id is the part of the psyche that works to satisfy basic urges, and demands the immediate gratification of desires. Dostoevsky wanted to kill his father, but aspects about reality such as fear and guilt held him back from doing this. Smerdyakov murders his father, satisfying the impulses of Dostoevsky’s id. In Dost oevsky’s life, the murder of his father by an unknown man drove him to become epileptic. â€Å"It is a dangerous thing when one’s wishes actually come true† (Freud 105), and when Dostoevsky got what he wished for, he immediately blamed himself. Many people have accused Dostoevsky of not being a real epileptic; among them was Sigmund Freud, who stated in his essay Dostoevsky and Parricide: â€Å"Dostoevsky referred to himself as an epileptic, but it is highly probable that this so-called epilepsy was only a symptom of his neurosis and must accordingly be classified as hystero-epilepsy- that is, a severe hysteria† (101). Freud believed that Dostoevsky’s epilepsy was actually a psychological problem, working hand in hand with his neurosis, due to the repression of his id’s desires. Similarly, Smerdyakov faked an epilepsy to be able to get away with the murder he committed. Smerdyakov has now become a clear way of Dostoevsky finally fulfilling his id’s wishes, even if it is in story form. It is almost as if Dostoevsky had an elaborate plan in mind for murdering his father, and reenacted it in Smerdyakov. He must have given Smerdyakov his own trait of epilepsy in order to further associate himself wit h the character, more fully realizing his own id through the character’s actions. When Dostoevsky’s father was murdered, it was rumored to be by one of his own serfs, just as Smerdyakov acts almost as a serf to his own father. Making their relationship even more strained, Smerdyakov is the illegitimate son of Fyodor, and must service his other three sons. Ultimately, Smerdyakov’s death represents Dostoevsky’s own ongoing fear of death, for according to Freud he went through a process where: â€Å"One has wished another person dead and now one is this other person and is dead oneself† (102). Even though Smerdyakov isn’t shown as the hero in the book, Dostoevsky greatly sympathizes with the villain. The reason for this can be seen as Smerdyakov represents Dostoevsky’s impulse to murder, or id, and he is justifying his own thoughts of committing parricide through illustrating the substantial amount that Fyodor Pavlovich, or in reality Do stoevsky’s Father, mistreats his children. Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov culminates his lifelong obsession with parricide, which created a strong impact on the author’s psyche. In Dostoevsky and Parricide, Sigmund Freud explains parricide as â€Å"the principal and primal crime of humanity as well as of the individual. It is in any case the main source of guilt† (103). He believes that every human being will inevitably share continuous guilt for society’s primal crime, even if they are not directly responsible. As a group, society will then try to disavow it’s guilt. Dostoevsky is taking society’s guilt for murdering his father all on himself. Just like the primal brothers found redemption in obeying their dead father by avoiding the women in their tribe, Dostoevsky tried to find redemption in suffering with epilepsy. Since his father punished him so often, punishing himself seemed like the best way to obey his father’s w ishes. In 1849, Dostoevsky wrote a letter to his brother stating â€Å"to be a human being among human beings, and remain one forever, no matter what misfortunes befall, not to become depressed and not to falter this is what life is, herein lies its task† (Toutonghi). This letter illustrates how Dostoevsky battled with the ability to be happy through all his guilt. The Brothers Karamazov oozes with evidence of Dostoevsky’s personal struggle, particularly seen in the court trial. The prestigious Fetyukovich, defending Dmitri’s innocence in the trial, defined the lines of what it really means to be a father: Gentleman of the jury, what is a father, a real father, what does this great word mean, what terribly great idea is contained in this appellation? We have just indicated something of what a true father ought to be. In the present case the father, the late Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov, in no way fitted the idea of a father that has just spoken to our hearts. That is cal amity. Yes indeed, some fathers are calamity. (Dostoevsky 742) Fetyukovich is claiming that in no way can this case be investigating a parricide, for Fyodor does not fit the social standards of what a father should be. Based on Fetyukovich’s speech, Dostoevsky must agree that an unfit father should not be deemed a father at all, however, based on Dmitri’s guilty sentence at the end of the novel, he also recognizes that society thinks in a more simplistic manner; if a man is biologically you’re father, you do not have the right to have contempt for him. In the tract Civilization and its Discontents, Freud claims that â€Å"society is the source of all guilt and suffering† (735). Society creates values and moral upon which to â€Å"civilize† its people, and along with these comes shame, disgust, and â€Å"unpleasure†. This is certainly true in Dmitri’s case, and Dostoevsky’s. It’s a very nauseating feeling to hate your own parent, but when they haven’t treated you as their child, why should you fulfill the responsibility of being a loving one? After the murder of Dostoevsky’s father, these issues left him hopelessly sick. His own father was never kind or caring towards him, so when his death occurred, Dostoevsky lashed out at himself for never being a loving son. But the most twisted part of all of this is that Dostoevsky sincerely enjoyed it, he found pleasure in making his ego feel guilt. His life became an enigma in which he had to make himself suffer to be happy, while this took away his rights at being a morally righteous human being. This is when the writers own deep-seated masochism really kicked in. Completing Freud’s psychological triumvirate is the ego, represented by the other three brothers, Ivan, Dmitri, and Alyosha. The guilty part of the conscience is always found in the ego, so Dostoevsky’s ego is represented in the guilty characters. These brothers all have in common that their father was inhumane to them all their lives, causing them to desire suffering. They had virtually no respect left for Fyodor Pavlovich, and at times even wanted him dead. Although none of them actually acted upon it, Ivan and Dmitri both held themselves morally responsible for what happened. Dmitri, having feelings of abhorrence for his father fueled by the rivalry over a women, Grushenka, screamed to the heavens just days before the murder: â€Å"If I haven’t killed him I’ll come again and kill him. You can’t protect him† (Dostoevsky 139). Dmitri’s lust to kill his father over his love for a woman shows a classic case of Freud’s Oedipal Com plex. Ivan feels equally at fault because he knowingly ran away from his responsibilities of stopping the parricide, or even looking after his family when he could sense something was wrong. After his father’s death, Ivan soon falls very sick from an overly guilty conscience, just as what happened to Dostoevsky. These two brothers represent Dostoevsky’s terribly guilty ego in both of those aspects, wanting the parricide due to the Oedipal Complex, and not doing anything to stop it. The masochistic part of Dostoevsky’s ego is shown specifically in the character of Dmitri. He is the only one of the brothers who actually ends up being condemned, in court, for the murder. His punishment is to be sent off to Siberia. This can be compared back to Dostoevsky because he was sent to Siberia on the basis of something he did not do. Dostoevsky firmly accepted his punishment, â€Å"as a substitute for the punishment he deserved for his sin against his real father† (F reud 106). Dmitri was prepared to suffer in Siberia as well for similar reasons, claiming, â€Å"It’s for that babe I am going to Siberia now. I am not a murderer, but I must go to Siberia† (Dostoevsky 612). The â€Å"babe† that Dmitri is referring to is the whole of the innocent children in Russia who have suffered for the sins of mankind. Dmitri is therefore going to Siberia as a means of taking up the burden of society’s guilt, just as Dostoevsky did. Dostoevsky’s ego stopped him from acting out the murder of his father, as it made him realize, according to Freud’s Oedipal complex, that he cannot commit parricide because his father is stronger than him, and he would be castrated for trying. Similarly, Dmitri’s ego stopped him from murdering his father as he stood below his window with a weapon. Dmitri described that he wanted to kill his father, but some transient force held him back. This was obviously not the heaven’s savi ng him, but the ego doing its job. Even the hero in this novel, Alyosha, feels guilt for not allowing himself to be more aware of his family’s fatal situation. He deals with his guilt in a more spiritual and religious way, as he has all his life. Alyosha suffers from an unresolved Oedipal complex just like Dostoevsky. The power of the Oedipal complex, and the importance of the relationship between mother and son come into play when Fyodor tells Alyosha about the demeaning things that he did to his mother. As Fyodor was in the midst of telling Alyosha about how she was a severe ‘shrieker’, Alyosha fell on the floor in a seizure like form, crying in hysterics. Since Alyosha never got to properly go through the whole process of the Oedipal Complex, he is stuck in a stage of anxiety. Hearing these things about his mother, who he never got the chance to love, made him feel unbearably sad and guilty, and caused him to react with shrieks similar to hers. There is an apparent significance in the way Dostoe vsky portrays Alyosha as a character angelic beyond what is plausible for a human being; he had a son named Alyosha, who died at the age of three from what seemed to be epilepsy. Alyosha is now even more so Dostoevsky’s ego because his character is a representation of Dostoevsky’s guilt over his son dying from an illness that he allegedly inherited from him, as well as his grief over the death. Making Alyosha this heavenly character is a statement that his son is living on in the heavens, as well as letting a bit of his grief spill out onto the pages of The Brothers Karamazov, using his novel as â€Å"writing therapy†. It is a convoluted situation to develop moral masochism. When you’re displeasure induces pleasure, as it did for Dostoevsky and the brothers in the novel, a perversion has very obviously surfaced. A quote from Dostoevsky’s novel draws straight back to masochism: â€Å"See, Ive grown terribly fond of my own misery these past five yea rs† (349). Dostoevsky’s sadness had led him to almost feel safe, just being sad. It gives him a sense that he’s back home again. The real truth in the Brother’s Karamazov does not lie in its plot line, but in the underlying psychology and it’s connection to Dostoevsky’s life. The situations that Fyodor, Smerdyakov, and the other three brothers are put into fit snuggly into our author’s life, and each of their personalities corresponds with a different aspect of our author’s psyche. Dostoevsky was a man who unfortunately never recovered from the original struggles of the Oedipal Complex, due to the early perversions of his mind caused by his father’s death, and harshness during the time in which he was alive. His father perverted his superego making it sadistic, which then also perverted his ego, making it masochistic. His superego is conclusively represented by the fatherly figure Fyodor, the id by the murderer Smerdyakov, and his ego by the guilt-ridden sons Ivan, Alyosha, and Dmitri. It is only reasonable to assume that Dostoevsky chose to put his characters so close in relation to himself because he needed to confess all the warring feelings that he internalized in himself for years, and that he wanted to create a fantasy in which his darkest wishes were fulfilled. The internalized feelings consist of an obsession over parricide, which has stayed with Dostoevsky since the murder of his father. This obsession stands out clearly in the pages of the book , as a large part of it is filled with the characters struggling with their strained relationship with their father and their guilt over his murder. Dostoevsky mirrors these strains to his personal struggles with his own guilt and responsibility for his father’s murder, and identifying what a father even is. Dostoevsky feels that a father has to be loving in order to be considered a father, but his moral codes obviously contradict those of society’s laws. The taboo of hating ones parents in addition to society having guilt over its primal crime all the more fuel Dostoevsky’s pangs of conscience. Perhaps the honesty of this book, in which Dostoevsky represents himself as he is instead of idealizing himself, is why it draws so many people in and changes the way they think after reading it. Works Cited Bondarenko, Aleksandr. Fyodor Dostoevsky – Russiapedia Literature Prominent Russians. Get Russianalized – Russiapedia. TV-Novosti, 2005. Web. 12 Jan. 2012. . Dostoyevsky, Fyodor. The Brothers Karamazov: A Novel in Four Parts with Epilogue. Trans. Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. San Francisco: North Point, 1990. Print. Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents Part III. Civilization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton, 1962. 735-42. Print. . Dostoevsky and Parricide. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Ed. James Strachey. London: Hogarth, 1962. 98-111. Print. . The Ego and the Id. The Freud Reader. Ed. Peter Gay. New York: W.W. Norton, 1989. 629-58. Print. Toutonghi, Pauls. Fyodor Dostoevsky (Dostoyevsky) | Biography |. Fyodor Dostoevsky (Dostoyevsky) | The Brothers Karamazov. N.p., 2010. Web. 13 Jan. 2012. .

Depression in the 1800s - 1211 Words

Dealing with Depression in the 1800’s William Faulkner and Charlotte Gilman are two well known writers for intriguing novels of the 1800’s. Their two eccentric pieces, â€Å"A Rose for Emily† and â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper† are equally alluring. These authors and their works have been well recognized, but also critized. The criticism focuses on the society that is portrayed in these novels. The modern readers of today’s society are resentful to this dramatic society. These two novels are full of tradition, rebellion and the oppression over women’s rights. Both of these novels share the misery of the culture, but there is some distinction between the two. â€Å"A Rose for Emily† is a social commentary while â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper† is an†¦show more content†¦She was difficult and would not show any weakness to the people around her. Her traditional and adamant ways lead her to the horrible, lonely, and empty death. Although, it’s a novel of the same time period and influence, â€Å"The Yellow Wall Paper†, by Charlotte Gilman deals with the society of the time in a moderately different way than Faulkner’s novel. The main character of this novel â€Å"the woman†Show MoreRelatedInsanity in The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman1016 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"Gilman suffers a near mental breakdown in the mid 1800’s, and been prescribed a rest treatment very similar to the one prescribed to the narrator in â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper† (Korb, Rena. â€Å"An Overview of â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper†. Gale Online Encyclopedia). She writes this story as if it were various journal entries written by the narrator in a first person point of view. In â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper†, by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, the narrator faces depression, insanity and anxiety caused by her surroundingsRead MoreMental Illness And Condition That Influences The Brain1654 Words   |  7 Pagesthe mental illness. Depression is a mental illness and condition that influences the brain. The mental illness affects an individual’s feelings and thoughts negatively which results in the lowering of one’s mood. 2. Describe the nature of the mental illness. Depression is a real mental condition that affects many people around the world. It affects all ages, social backgrounds and genders. There are many signs and symptoms of depression. Common symptoms of depression are sleeping problemsRead MoreThe Yellow Wallpaper, By Charlotte Gilman958 Words   |  4 Pagesnot expect. In the early 1800’s postpartum depression was misdiagnosed by a physician and calling it â€Å"hysteria†. In this time period, physicians were only males so they were more dominant; and females were looked down upon. Postpartum depression is what a mother suffers from after giving birth. It is a combination of hormonal changes and psychological adjustment to motherhood. Mothers who develop postpartum depression are at greater risk of developing other major depressions later on in life, and haveRead MoreInsanity and Feminism in The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman504 Words   |  3 PagesGilman reflects the intense struggle with of a woman during the late 1800’s. However, as the story unfolds, we realize the reasons for this insanity and the connections of this breakdown to the main character’s husband, John. What we discover is the way women were treated during the late 1800’s and the significance of this treatment on their lives. The story clearly expresses the pain, opposition, and depression experienced by women at that time and provides a backdrop for theRead MoreThe Yellow Wallpaper719 Words   |  3 Pagesthe grips of depression and the restrictions prescribed by her physician husband a woman struggles with maintaining her sanity and purpose. As a new mother and a writer, and she is denied the responsibility and intellectual stimulation of these elements in her life as part of her rest cure. Her world is reduced to prison-like enforcement on her diet, exercise, sleep and intellectual activities until she is well again. As she gives in to the restrictions and falls deeper into depression, she focusesRead MoreThe Yellow Wallpaper, By Charlotte Perkins Gilman1500 Words   |  6 Pagesworthlessness for longer than two weeks, it is likely that they suffer from depression. Depression is a mood disorder that causes symptoms that affect how we feel, think, and handle daily activities. Due to its widespread occurrence, scientists have been searching for an effective treatment for this mood disorder for decades. During the late 1800s, one of the treatment options available for those suffering with depression and other nervous illnesses was the rest cure. Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s shortRead MoreThe European Economic Evolution after the Discovery of America881 Words   |  4 PagesDue to that take over, Europe became stronger while the Asian empires became weaker and weaker. By the 1800’s Europe was in the position of authority over much of Asia, which included the Indian subcontinent. In the mid and late 1700’s, Europe saw a rise in capitalism and became a strong nation armed with efficient military machines which allowed them to grow in power across the world. By 1800, European colonies and culture had expanded to slightly over 35% of the world. The European’s believedRead MoreThe Yellow Wallpaper, By Harriet Beecher Stowe967 Words   |  4 Pagesa new mother suffering from depression. Through her work she reveals the strength and influence men had over women, the lack of knowledge pertaining to mental health and gender roles present during the 1800s. To begin, Gilman reveals very early on in the short story that the main character, Jane suffers from a mental illness that her husband john, who is also her physician fails to acknowledge is real. John along with other men in Janes family downplay her depression by attempting to convince herRead MoreWomen And Women s Impact On Society1417 Words   |  6 PagesAs America has grown and developed different forms of social classifications, there have also been instances in history where men and women embodied specific roles in their relationships and households. During in the 1800’s, women were expected to be the caretakers of the home, to produce children, to never really have professional jobs of their own, and to do as they were told by their husband. During this time men were the leading figure of â€Å"dominance† in the household due to their social and professionalRead MoreThe Federal Government Has Changed Over Time1020 Words   |  5 PagesThe federal government r ole in America from the late 1800s during Reconstruction, up to the early 1900s during the Great Depression, often expanded and contracted in response to the demands of the American public. During this time frame, the nation underwent major changes and faced many challenges in order to get where we are today. As a country, our priorities shifted from being concerned about encounters right in front of us, to encouraging and pursuing a better future for everyone. After years

Race At Work African Americans Versus Whites - 891 Words

Discussion Paper 2: Race at Work African Americans versus whites does it matter in the workplace? We must all agree that there is some form of racism that still exists in the workplace, as for me I strongly agree with Pager and Western that race still exists in the United States and exists at places other than work. According to Society the basics, racism is the belief that one racial category is innately superior or inferior to another. From birth I believe that the dominant races, in particular Caucasians, are taught that they are better than the minorities. I feel that they are taught the Authoritarian personality theory. This means that they view society naturally competitive, which is fine, the part that makes it so bad is that they believe they are better and must dominate the minorities. They feel that it is there duty to obtain better careers and even live in better communities. On the other hand, minorities face challenges when looking for jobs that offer the same packages a s the dominant race, such as good salaries, health care benefits, and job security. The authoritarian majority feel that no one can interfere with their businesses that have been created by their people so the less fortunate should take whatever they can. What they don’t understand is that this causes more taxes to set up reforms to offer a helping hand for the minorities. A study was shown from a three person’s team that consisted of three men from a different nationality. Although they hadShow MoreRelatedBrown vs. Board of Education: Case Study1745 Words   |  7 Pageswhich pervaded nearly every aspect of American life. One of the realms that Plessy v Ferguson expressly applied to was the area of public schools. Public schools in America could be racially segregated, based on the assumption that African-American schools were equal to their white counterparts. The assumptions made in Plessy versus Ferguson were based on the false premise that it was possible to sust ain equality in a racist environment. The African-American schools were not equal. The steps leadingRead MoreAfrican Americans And The Juvenile Justice System1248 Words   |  5 PagesRace and Sentencing It has been brought up that certain race and ethic affects a person’s sentencing. Many studies have addressed the question are African Americans treated more severely than similarly situated whites? (Mitchell, 2005). Observers had indeed noted that black defendants get more severe sentencing than white defendants do (Spohn, 1981). For many years’ social scientist has examined this theory and came up with three explanations, racial discrimination, Wealth discrimination, andRead MoreThoughts on Characteristics of Race and Gender: Du Bois vs. De Beauvoir1146 Words   |  5 PagesBois versus De Beauvoir: Essential characteristics of race and gender In the debate over equality for both African-Americans and women, the question of nature versus nurture inevitably arises. Although most authors acknowledge that there are differences between these historically discriminated-against groups and members of the hegemonic culture, the origin of those differences has been hotly debated. While the African-American intellectual W.E.B Du Bois was inclined to conceptualize African-AmericansRead MoreAlain Locke Essay1153 Words   |  5 Pages With the exception of Native Americans, there is no race of people that originated in America. Yet today, we all come together under the colors of red, white and blue, sing the National Anthem and call ourselves quot;Americansquot;. Despite our differences in religion, norms, values, national origins, our pasts, and our creeds, we all combine under one common denominator. Alain Locke addresses this issue of cultural pluralism in his article, quot;Who and What is `Negro?quot; In this articleRead MoreComin g Of Age Throughout Mississippi By Anne Moody1362 Words   |  6 PagesThough we Americans, in all of our efforts, feel as if the day of racism is coming to an end, I feel it is merely evolving into a much more subtle approach. Seeing life through the words of Anne Moody in her book entitled, Coming of Age in Mississippi, shows that racism, even back then, is treated with remedies versus a cure. After the many anti-discrimination legislations passed as well as activist groups shedding light on all of the significant differences and injustices that African Americans faceRead MoreIdentity Crisis Among African Americans1618 Words   |  7 PagesProfessor Sandra Staton-Taiwo Identity Crisis amongst African Americans 17 November 2014 Abstract The question of self-identity has been commonly argued in field of the African American literature; with scholars such as Martin R. Delany and W.E.B Du Bois argue about the emphasis on race and racial consciousness. Together Du Bois and Delaney stress the importance of the color line, or the racial segregation in the United States, as a critical part of American history; nonetheless they both had completelyRead MoreTwo Colors One Land1881 Words   |  7 PagesTWO COLORS ONE LAND â€Å"American Dream† is a taboo for many people from different nationalities who are pursuit of happiness. One of the former U.S presidents Bill Clinton defined American dream as; if ones do the best that they can, all the doors will open to them in order to reach happiness and to benefit from the opportunities. (Michael S., 2004) Throughout the world many people day dream to be a part of American dream one day. However the missing point which they do not know is that theRead MoreRacism In To Kill A Mockingbird1570 Words   |  7 Pagessegregated many races in other countries, but in the United States, the African-Americans have especially been victims of racism and segregation based upon their color. In recent history, the struggle to achieve equality and eradicate racism in the United States has been an ongoing battle since the late 1800’s. In Harper Lee s classic novel To Kill a Mockingbird, Lee uses her own experience and draws from events during her childhood to bring to expose racism against African Americans in the south.Read MoreRace and its Implications in the Criminal Justice System1008 Words   |  5 PagesRace has continually been an important issue within the United States and most predominantly the criminal justice system. Racial tension in America is often thought of as being white versus black, even though that is not in fact the case. African-Americans view the system as favoring whites while trying to ke ep them at the bottom. While whites claim that the criminal justice system is colorblind, blacks clearly do not feel this way; whites underestimate the racial divide in the criminal justice systemRead MoreRacial Inequality And Discrimination Is A Major Factor853 Words   |  4 Pages Racial inequality and discrimination is a major factor that is still present in America’s society today. Considering the fact that America’s history of racial complications is still an issue in today’s society. Minorities (African American, Asian Americans, Hispanics/Latinos) which is accounted for almost half of the population if combined, are the ones that face discrimination the most, typically everywhere they go and especially in the workforce. They are not treated as equally as everyone else

DIALOGUES OF THE DEAD Essay Example For Students

DIALOGUES OF THE DEAD Essay A monologue from the dialogues of Lucian NOTE: This monologue is reprinted with the authors permission. All inquiries should be directed to the author at: [emailprotected] HANNIBAL: I think we can all agree that the highest praise is due to those who have fought their way to greatness from obscurity—who have pulled themselves up by their own bootstraps—clothed themselves in power, and proven themselves worthy of that authority. I entered Spain with only a handful of men, fought bravely, proved myself a leader, and eventually—as a result of my exploits—was honored with the supreme command. I conquered the Celtiberians, subdued Western Gaul, crossed the Alps, overran the valley of the Po, sacked town after town, made myself master of the plains, approached the bulwarks of the capital, and in one day slew such a host that their finger-rings were measured by bushels, and the rivers were bridged by their bodies. Unlike Alexander here, I never pretended to be a god, never related visions of my mother—I made no secret of the fact that I was mere flesh and blood. My rivals were the most capable generals in the world, commandi ng the best soldiers in the world. I never warred with Medes or Assyrians, who fly before they are pursued and yield the victory to anyone with the courage to take it. Alexander, on the other hand, in increasing and extending the dominion he inherited from his father, was merely following the path set out for him by Fortune. This â€Å"fabled conqueror† no sooner crushed his puny adversaries in the victories of Issus and Arbela, than he forsook the traditions of his country and lived the life of a Persian, accepting the worship of his subjects, handing his friends over to the executioner, or even assassinating them at his own table! I always respected the freedom of my country—never attempted to subjugate her for my own personal glory. I answered when she called. And when the enemy with their huge armament invaded Libya, I laid aside the privileges of my office and submitted to my sentence without a murmur. Yet Alexander would call me a barbarian because I’m uns killed in Greek culture—because I couldn’t recite Homer. I admit, I never enjoyed the advantages of Aristotles instruction like he did. I had to make due with such qualities as were mine by nature. And it is on these grounds that I claim pre-eminence. I do not deny that my rival has all the luster that attaches to the wearing of a diadem, and I’ve been told that, for Macedonians, such things have charms. But I refuse to believe this constitutes a higher claim than the courage and genius of one who owed nothing to Fortune, and everything to his own resolution.